With a somewhat better grasp of the nature of and correlation between reality and ideology we can now consider the means by which the two may be cohesively shifted upon the planes of existence. There are essentially two main categories of events in which such a merge may take place.

The first of these is of a deductive nature, where one’s perspective of the nature of the workings of the world around oneself (whether focused upon a particular field or dispersed in a less deterministic and hence broader perspective) leads one to extrapolate upon what one perceives to exist in reality and mentally visualise or create a new combination of the known elements to form new concepts and ideas. The construction of a rubble wall from rocks is an example of such.

The second of these is of a more inductive nature, where one perceives either an abstract pattern within the seemingly chaotic workings of the environment around the self or when one perceives the results of a deductive shift of ideology with reality, and then acts upon such to emulate that perceived. A lot of such involves the emulation of humans or animals by other humans, such as the emulation of gliding species to come up with various forms of gliders or parachutes of sorts.

In many cases elements of both categories are present. One cannot really deduce without inducing the building blocks for any such deduction and even cases where one does not really deal in the deductions of others but the induction of some natural phenomenon is is commonly the case that some deduction is still required to find an application for such an induction.

A deduction involves the extrapolation of one’s reality into the realm of one’s ideology while an induction involves an anomaly in one’s reality being incorporated into the realm of one’s ideology. Shifts in either way are happening all the time, though one would hazard the guess that the deductive progression is more active.

Leave a Reply