This is a continuation from part 1 where the background facts and the deductions made on the basis of them were laid out succinctly. In this section I make the assumption that readers have read through the first part and shall delve straight into the laying out of my views on abortion.

I hold that there exists a very real moral dimension to abortion and that abortion is an act with moral implications regardless of circumstances. However the moral implications of abortion are empathically not to be considered a constant throughout the process of pregnancy but is representative of 5 primary moral phases, each representative of exponential increases in relative moral implications of any abortion performed.

It is possibly one of the most controversial issues in the modern world with debate between “pro-life” and “pro-choice” groups remaining fierce. Still, the heated nature of an issue does not place it beyond discussion and there is truly very little that I consider to be beyond me to form an opinion about. Abortion is no exception and it was only natural that I found it within myself to conduct research into the matter. I am truly glad that I did as, without wish for self-embellishment, I feel that I have succeeded in coming up with one of the most consistent and ethically sound standpoints that could be had on the issue (and this is not beyond debate ^_~).

The infrastructure of a location is the structure that supports the integration of the functions of that location.  Due to the connective nature of this concept it is often associated with transportation roadways or utilities which themselves fulfill this role. Airports also qualify as infrastructure. We humans make use of the infrastructure at virtually all times of the day and night in one form or another as the electricity we use to power the clock in our rooms has travelled through wiring with an eventual but direct connection to a power-station miles away.